Patriarchal Relationships, Subordination and Glorification of Marriage: The Dilemma of Women across Generation in Living and interpreting Love
PDF
PDF-ENG

Keywords

love
romantic
marriage
oppression
subordination

How to Cite

Ismail, N. (2018). Patriarchal Relationships, Subordination and Glorification of Marriage: The Dilemma of Women across Generation in Living and interpreting Love. Jurnal Perempuan, 23(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.34309/jp.v23i1.219

Abstract

This paper focuses on the experience of women across generation living and interpreting love as part of their lives. Their experiences in living an interpreting love will be seen in two points, their romantic relationship and marriage or family institution. Based on the data of six subjects of research with different backgrounds like age, marital status and sexual orientation, showed that they have different perspective on love and marriage or family institution compare to mainstream society. They assume and believe love or romantic relationship has close relation with patriarchal cultural values, like men’s domination, subordination and ownership if we agreed with mainstream society’s thought on love. They also believe that marriage is an institution where patriarchy’s cultural values is produced there and will disadvantage women if the marriage is not built on equal and just relation. These six subjects of research agree with grand feminism narrative that love supposed to be not always related with ownership, men’s domination and must be liberating women as an independence and autonomous person.

https://doi.org/10.34309/jp.v23i1.219
PDF
PDF-ENG

References

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) n.y., Nikah, Talak dan Cerai, serta Rujuk,

-2015, diakses 25 Januari 2017, https://www.bps.go.id/

linkTableDinamis/view/id/893

Barker, N 2012, Not the Marrying Kind: A Feminist Critique of Same-

Sex Marriage, Palgrave Macmillan, United Kingdom.

Broogard, B 2015, On Romantic Love: Simple Truths about a Complex

Emotion, Oxford University Press, United Kingdom.

Burton, N 2016, ‘These Are the 7 types of Love’, Psychology Today,

diakses 25 Januari 2017, https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/

hide-and-seek/201606/these-are-the-7-types-love

Card, C 1996, ‘Against Marriage and Motherhood’, Hypatia, vol. 11

No. 3, hh. 1-23.

Cleary, S 2015, Existentialism and Romantic Love, Palgrave Macmillan,

United State of America.

Firestone, S 1970, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist

Revolution, William Morrow and Company, New York, United State

of America.

Goldman, E 1911, Marriage and Love, Mother Earth Publishing

Association, New York, United State of America.

hooks, bell 2000, Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics,

South End Press, Cambridge, MA.

Okin, SM 1989, Justice, Gender, and the Family, Basic Books, Inc.,

Publishers, New York, United State of America.

Johnson, P 2005, Love, Heterosexuality and Society, Routledge,

Milton Park.

Nye, RA 2004, ‘Sexuality’, in TA Meade & ME Wiesner-Hanks (eds.), A

Companion to Gender History, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, USA.

Wagoner, RE 1997, The Meanings of Love: An Introduction to

Philosophy of Love, Praeger Publishers, United States of America.

All Writen material, unless otherwise stated, is the copyright of Jurnal Perempuan. View expressed in articles and letter are those of the contributors, and not neccasarily those of publisher.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.