Abstract
After the resolution about the petition of extending the meaning of adultery rampant discussed in the community, Article 284 KUHP is still an interesting article to be reviewed. Diversity in the Indonesian community causes a number of applied regulations must become as fair as possible to be a legal protection for all layers of society, including the regulations ruling the crimes of decency. Different understanding about violating decency in some community groups causes the article in Decency Crime section, especially in adultery case, often marginalizes some groups of community. There are indeed some group that might be potential to be victims of adultery cases if the meaning of adultery ever happens to be broadened. Further in its application, Article 284 KUHP makes the line between morality and crime becomes very thin. This research is done using the approach of feminist legal theory, by reviewing legal text to get an understanding on how sexuality and imagination about the woman victim is projected by law.References
“Alasan Ani Mau Dinikahi Eyang Subur Saat Masih Berusia 18 Tahun” 2013, Detik.com, 1 Mei, dilihat 22 November 2016, https://hot.detik.com/celeb/2235108/alasan-ani-mau-dinikahi-eyang-subur-saat-masih-berusia-18-tahun
Bonger, WA 1982, Pengantar Tentang Kriminologi, Pembangunan dan Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Cain, PA 1990, “Feminism and The Limits of Equality”, Georgia Law Review, vol. 24, no. 4, hh. 803-848.
Hamzah, A 2009, Speciale Delicten, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Harkrisnowo, H 2008, “Rekonstruksi Konsep Pemidanaan: Suatu Gugatan terhadap Proses Legislasi dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia”, Orasi Upacara Pengukuhan Guru Besar Tetap Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Auditorium Djokosoetono Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Depok.
Hartiningsih, M 2017, Jalan Pulang, Mardi Yuana, Depok.
Hartjen, CA 1978, Crime and Criminalization, Preager Publisher, California.
Huijbers, T 1982, Filsafat Hukum dalam Lintasan Sejarah, Penerbit Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Huijbers, T 1995, Filsafat Hukum, Penerbit Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Husak, D 2008, Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, New York.
Pratiwi, AM 2016, “Upaya Memastikan Hak Konstitusional Perempuan Penghayat Kepercayaan”, Jurnalperempuan.org, dilihat 12 April 2018, https://www.jurnalperempuan.org/berita/upaya-memastikan-hak-konstitusional-perempuan-penghayat-kepercayaan
Rahmadi, D 2012, “Cerita Pernikahan Kontroversial Bupati Garut Aceng Fikri”, Merdeka.com, 30 Desember, dilihat 22 November 2016, https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/cerita-pernikahan-kontroversial-bupati-garut-aceng-fikri.html
Reksodiputro, M 2007, Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Pengabdian Hukum, Jakarta.
Reksodiputro, M 2009, Menyelaraskan Pembaruan Hukum, Komisi Hukum Nasional RI, Jakarta, hh. 99-101.
Reksodiputro, M 2013, Perenungan: Perjalanan Reformasi Hukum, Komisi Hukum Nasional RI, Jakarta.
Reksodiputro, M 2016, Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Bahan perkuliahan, semester Gasal, 2016. 8 Desember 2016, Universitas Indonesia.
Setiadi, E 2004, Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana, Unisba Press, Bandung.
Smart, C 2003, Feminism and The Power of Law, Routledge, London.
Suseno, FM 1987, Etika Dasar Masalah-Masalah Pokok Filsafat Moral, Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Perundang-undangan
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Putusan No. 46/PUU-XIV/2016, 6 Desember 2017.
Republik Indonesia 1915, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1915, No. 732, Jakarta.
Republik Indonesia 1945, Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Jakarta.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No. 37 Tahun 2007, Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan, 28 Juni 2007, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007, No. 80, Jakarta.