Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Community Knowledge and Behavior Towards Unwanted Pregnancy in Eight Provinces of Sumatra: Between Religious, Customary and State Norms

Dina Lumbantobing, Sita Van Bemmelen, Andi Misbahul Pratiwi, Anita Dhewy

Abstract

Based on field observations and experiences in assisting women by the PERMAMPU Consortium, there are still many women who face unwanted pregnancy (KTD). Therefore it is needed research to find out the needs of women related to KTD. This article focuses on three things, namely (1) understanding and knowledge of informants about KTD; (2) perception of the best and the worst solutions for KTD cases; (3) women’s behavior related to KTD. The study uses three categories of KTD: KTD experienced by married women, KTD experienced by unmarried women, and KTD experienced by victims of acts of violence. This article is written from the 2014 PERMAMPU Consortium research report entitled The Compilation of Unwanted Pregnancy Research Reports/KTD in Eight Provinces, Sumatra Island. The study used a qualitative approach with data collection conducted through interviews and FGDs. This paper shows that there are similarities and differences in the understanding, perceptions, behavior of women and society in relation to KTD. Various forms of rules and norms generally view pregnancy as natural, so that it is always desirable, have controlled women and society in behaving and handling KTD. There are various forms of KTD and various forms of coping methods that are not always in line with existing rules and are generally done secretly. Thus, women who experience unwanted pregnancy need recognition of their problems, including their voices and needs and supported to make decisions for themselves.  

Keywords

unwanted pregnancy; religious norms; customary norms; abortion

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bearak, J, dkk 2018, “Global, Regional, and Subregional Trends in Unintended Pregnancy and Its Outcomes From 1990 to 2014: Estimates from a Bayesian Hierarchical Model”, The Lancet Global Health Journal, vol. 6, issue 4, PE380-E389, April, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30029-9.

BKKBN 2007, Kamus Istilah Program Keluarga Berencana, Direktorat Pelayanan Informasi dan Dokumentasi, Jakarta.

Departemen Kesehatan RI 2000, Ibu Sehat, Bayi Sehat, Depkes RI, Jakarta.

Dhewy, A 2017, “Analisis Wacana Kritis terhadap Pasal Aborsi dalam UU Kesehatan dan PP Kesehatan Reproduksi”, Jurnal Perempuan 93 HKSR dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, vol. 22, no. 2, hh. 147-153.

Guttmacher Institute 2008, Aborsi di Indonesia: Dalam Kesimpulan, Seri 2008, No. 2, Guttmacher Intitute, New York. https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/aborsi_di_indonesia.pdf

Pratiwi, AM 2017, “Ninuk Widyantoro: Pentingnya Pendidikan dan Pemenuhan HKSR”, Jurnal Perempuan 93 HKSR dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, vol. 22, no. 2, hh. 165-172.

Saptarini & Suparni 2016, “Determinan Kehamilan Tidak Diinginkan di Indonesia (Analisis Data Sekunder Riskesdas 2013)”, Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi, LITBANG Departemen Kesehatan Indonesia, http://ejournal.litbang.depkes.go.id/index.php/kespro/article/view/5096/4438

Widyantoro, N, Lestari, H 2004, Laporan Penelitian Penghentian Kehamilan tak Diinginkan yang Aman Berbasis Konseling: Penelitian di 9 Kota Besar, Yayasan Kesehatan Perempuan, Jakarta.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.