Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Data Collection to Fulfil the Targets for the SDGs: The APIK Gender Justice Index (AGJI)

Saskia Wieringa


Indonesia has committed itself to the 2030 Agenda with 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which were approved by the United Nations on September 25, 2015. Seventeen objectives and 169 related targets must be achieved by 2030. Gender equality is an independent goal (SDG number 5), but gender related issues are also contained in the goal of poverty alleviation (SDG 1), health care including maternal and child health (SDG 3) and education (SDG 4). SDG number 16 concerns a commitment to peace, access to justice and strong institutions. Reliable and inclusive gender statistics are needed to monitor progress towards achieving gender equality and justice and to identify key gender inequalities that require policy interventions. Both quantitative and qualitative data are needed. In addition, certain problems are specific for women, such as maternal death. Given the wide diversity in gender relations and socio-economic conditions of the Indonesian archipelago subnational data are required. This article outlines the methodology of designing the APIK Gender Justice Index. The main findings are that the availability of sex-disaggregated data at the subnational level leaves much to be desired. The AGJI proves to be a reliable, comprehensive and flexible tool that can easily be used by policy makers and activists to design policies and programs to address gender-based discrimination in Indonesia, for instance in the field of health. The AGJI is based on locally available data. The advantages of the AGJI are that it can be computed with a minimum of cost and effort to achieve a maximum of reliability and ease in use. The GSI was found to be comparable with the Global Gender Gap Index (GGGI) for Indonesia but it is more sensitive to political empowerment. The AGJI assesses in how far women have been able to take up leadership positions at subnational levels, including at the village level and are represented in the major decision-making bodies such as the judiciary.


gender index; gender justice; gender statistics; SDGs

Full Text:



BPS 2017, Berita resmi statistik prevalense kekerasan terhadap perempuan di Indonesia. Hasil SPHPN 2016 No. 29/03/th. XX, 30 Maret, Badan Pusat Statistik, Jakarta.

BPS 2018, Kajian Lanjutan Indeks Ketimpangan Gender, Badan Pusat Statistik, Jakarta.

Charmes, J 2015, Time Use Across the World: Findings of a World Compilation of Time Use Surveys, UNDP Human Development Report Office, background Paper, New York.

Charmes, J & Wieringa, SE 2003, “Measuring women’s empowerment: an assessment of the Gender-related Development Index and the Gender Empowerment Measure”, Journal of Human Development, vol. 4, no.3.

Dijkstra, G 2002, “Revisiting UNDP’s GDI and GEM: towards an alternative”, Social Indicators research 57, hh. 301-38.

Katjasungkana, N 2013, “The Indonesian family as a contested site of women’s rights: the implementation of the Domestic Violence Act”, dalam M Mohamad & SE Wieringa (eds.), Family ambiguity and domestic violence in Asia; concept, law and process, Sussex Academic Press, Eastbourne.

KPPPA & BPS 2013, Profil perempuan Indonesia 2013, KPPPA, Jakarta.

Komnas Perempuan 2010, Catatan Tahunan Tentang Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan 2010, Komnas Perempuan, Jakarta.

Lianawati, E 2009, KDRT; tiada keadialan tanpa kepedulian; perspektif psikologi feminis, Paradigma, Yogyakarta. (particulalrly on the UU KDRT)

Marcoes, L & Hidayat, S (eds) 2018, Mendrobrak kawin anak; membangun kesadaran kritis pencegahan kawin anak, Yayasan Rumah Kita Bersama, Jakarta.

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia 2016,Profil kesehatan Repubik Indonesia 2015 The 2015 Health Profile of the Indonesian Republic 2015, Ministry of Health, Jakarta.

Mundayat, AA, Noerdin, E, Agustioni, E, Aripurnami, S & Wahyuni, S 2010, Target MDGs menurunkan angka kematian ibu tahun 2015 sulit dicapai, Women’s Research Institute, Jakarta.

Sen, A 1985, Commodities and capabilities, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam New York, N.Y.

Sen, A 2001, Development as freedom, Oxford University Press, Oxford New York.

Taniguchi, K & Tuwo, A 2014, New evidence on the gender wage gap in Indonesia, ADB economic series Working paper Series.

UNDP 1996, Human development report, UNDP, New York.

Wieringa, SE & Mohamad, M 2013, “Domestic Violence: an introduction to the debates”, dalam M Mohamad & SE Wieringa (eds.), Family ambiguity and domestic violence in Asia, Sussex Academic Press, Eastbourne, hh. 12-29.

Wieringa, SE 2015, “Gender harmony and the happy family; Islam, gender and sexuality in post-reformasi Indonesia”, Journal of South East Asian Research, vol. 23, no. 1, hh. 5-27.

Wieringa, SE 2019, Rule of law in Indonesia from the eyes of poor women and vulnerable groups; legal empowerment and the APIK gender justice index (AGJI), APIK, Jakarta.

Woodward, M & Rohmaniyah, I 2014, “The tawdry tale of ‘syech’ Puji and Luftiana: child marriage and polygamy on the boundary of the pesantren world”, dalam BJ Smith & M Woodward (eds.), Gender and power in Indonesian Islam; leaders, feminists, Sufis and pesantren selves, Routledge, London and New York, hh. 157-175.

World Economic Forum 2016, The Global Gender Gap report, World Economic Forum, Geneva.

Yentriyani, A, Ratih, A & Chandrakirana, K 2009, Kita bersikap; empat dasawarsa kekerasan terhadap perempuan dalam perjuangan berbangsa, Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan, Jakarta.

Zaluchu, F 2018, Gender inequality behind maternal mortality in Nias Island North Sumatra, Indonesia; towards a gender audit, PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.


  • There are currently no refbacks.