Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

The Interwoven of interests in Political Economy and Political Behavior of Women Members of Parliament

Dewi Komalasari

Abstract

The representation of women’s interest through women Members of Parliament (MPs) is achieved if there is a connection between constituents and parliamentarians. In order to be able to establish cooperation, it requires a deep understanding of their behavior. This article reveals the variety of relationships and political economic affiliations that surround women MPs. The relationship has been built since the nomination period to become a member of parliament, which in turn raises various interests and pressures that women parliamentarians must respond to. By understanding the various interests and pressures faced by women MPs, civil society can design action plans that trigger positive responses so as to minimize the potential risks.

Keywords

parliamentary political economy; elections; clientelism; patronage; women candidate; women in parliament

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aspinall, E & Sukmajati, M 2016, Electoral dynamics in Indonesia:

Money politics, patronage and clientelism at the grassroots, NUS

Press, Singapura.

Aspinall, E 2013, “A Nation in fragments: Patronage and

neoliberalism in contemporary Indonesia”, Critical Asian Studies, vol.

, no. 1, hh. 27-54.

Aspinall, E 2014, “When brokers betray: Clientelism, social networks

and electoral politics in Indonesia”, Critical Asian Studies, vol. 46, no.

, hh. 545–570.

Dahlerup, D & Freidenvall, L 2005, “Quotas as a Fast Track to Equal

Representation for Women: Why Scandinavia Is No Longer the

Model” dalam ML Krook & S Childs (eds.), Women, Gender and

Politics: A Reader, Oxford University Press, New York.

Keefer, P 2007, “Clientelism, credibility and the policy choices of

young democracies”, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 51,

no. 4, hh. 804-821.

Magaloni, B 2014, “Defining political clientelism’s persistence”,

dalam DA Brun & L Diamond (eds.), Political clientelism, social

policies, and the quality of democracy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins

University Press.

Marsh, D & Stoker, G 2002, Theory and Methods in Political Science,

Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

Mietzner, M 2013, “Political party financing in Indonesia is a recipe

for corruption”, Strategic Review, School of Government and Public

Policy, Jakarta.

Mietzner, M 2007, “Party financing in post-Soeharto Indonesia:

Between state subsidies and political corruption”, Contemporary

Southeast Asia, vol. 29, no. 2, hh. 238-263.

Prihatini, ES 2019, “Women’s views and experiences of accessing

National Parliament: Evidence from Indonesia”, Women’s Studies

International Forum, vol. 74, hh. 84-90.

Prihatini, ES 2018, “How can Indonesia increase the number of

women legislators?”, The Conversation, 25 January 2018.

Puskapol FISIP UI, 2015, “Analisis Perolehan Suara dalam Pemilu

: Oligarki Politik Dibalik Keterpilihan Caleg Perempuan”,

Laporan, http://www.puskapol.ui.ac.id/publikasi_puskapol/analisisperolehan-suara-dalam-pemilu-2014-oligarki-politik-dibalikketerpilihan-caleg-perempuan.html

Sherlock, S 2009, “Parties and Decision-making in the Indonesian

Parliament: The Case of the Anti-Pornography Bill”, Australian

Journal of Asian Law, vol. 10, no. 2.

Sherlock, S 2018, “What makes politican behave the way they do?”

MAMPU report on political economy of parliamentary representation

in Indonesia, Bappenas-Australian Government-MAMPU, Jakarta.

Terome, H (eds.) 2015, It’s a Politics: Rekam Jejak Pengalaman

Perempuan dalam Pemilu 2014, Kalyanamitra, Jakarta.

van Zyl, A 2010, “What’s wrong with constituency development

funds?”, International Budget Partnership Budget Brief, vol. 3, no. 10.

Warrener, D 2004, The drivers of change approach, Overseas

Development Institute, London.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.