Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

The Problem of “Women’s Work” and the Idea of Work Democratization for the Liberating Empowerment of Women

Fathimah Fildzah Izzati

Abstract

Women never make choices about their work democratically. In patriarchal society, “women’s work” is constructed as work that is in the area of social reproduction and is “natural” for women. Consequently, women are increasingly in a vulnerable position in the labor market. In addition, women also face obstacles to being actively involved in various democratic spaces such as unions and women’s movements, and wider social movements because they bear a double workload that is life-consuming. However, various women’s empowerment programs launched by a number of development institutions to overcome the problems faced by women turned out to be far from women’s interests. Empowerment, also known as “liberal empowerment”, actually depoliticized and atomized women. Feminist scholars also call for the importance of realizing “liberating empowerment”. Related to that, this paper sees that the process of democratization of work on women’s work is an effort that can be done to pave the way for women’s liberation.

 

Keywords

women’s work; democratization of work; empowerment; liberals; liberation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akram-Lodhi, AH, Kay, C & Borras, SM 2012, “The Political Economy of Land and the Agrarian Question in the Era of Neoliberal Globalization”, dalam AH Akram-Lodhi & C Kay (eds.), Peasants and Globalization: Political Economy, Rural Transformation and the Agrarian Question, Routledge, London, hh. 214-238.

Arifin, S 2015, “Perempuan dan Serikat Buruh”, Majalah Perburuhan Sedane, dilihat 22 April 2019, http://majalahsedane.org/perempuan-dan-serikat-buruh/

Arizpe, L & Aranda, J 1981, “The ‘Comparative Advantages’ of Women's Disadvantages: Women Workers in the Strawberry Export Agribusiness in Mexico”, Signs, vol. 7, no. 2, hh. 453-473.

Bhattacharya, T (ed.) 2017, Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression, Pluto Press, London.

Borras Jr, SM & Franco, J 2012, “Global Land Grabbing and Trajectories of Agrarian Change: A Preliminary Analysis”, Journal of Agrarian Change, vol. 12, no. 1, hh. 34–59.

Bryman, A 2008, Social Research Methods, edisi ketiga, Oxford University Press, Inc, New York.

Chung, H 2016, “What Britain can learn from Scandinavia when it comes to childcare”, The Conversation, dilihat 14 November 2016, http://theconversation.com/what-britain-can-learn-from-scandinavia-when-it-comes-to-childcare-68459

Coontz, S & Henderson, P 1986, “Introduction: 'Explanations' of Male Dominance”, dalam S Coontz & P Henderson (eds.), Women's Work Men's Property: The Origins of Gender and Class, Verso, London.

Dalla-Costa, M & James, S 1972, The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community, Falling Walls Press Ltd, Bristol.

Davis, Mike 2004, “Planet of Slums: Urban Involution and the Informal Proletariat”, New Left Review, vol. 26, March-April, hh. 5-34.

Delamont, S 2013, “Ethnography and participant observation”, dalam C Seale, G Gobo, JF Gubrium & D Silverman (eds.), Qualitative Research Practice, SAGE Publications, California.

Dhani, A 2017, “Macam-macam cuti melahirkan, dari 3 bulan hingga setahun”, Tirto.id, dilihat 10 Juli 2017, https://tirto.id/macam-macam-cuti-melahirkan-dari-3-bulan-hingga-setahun-csnn

Elson, D & Pearson, R 1981, “Nimble Fingers Make Cheap Workers': An Analysis of Women's Employment in Third World Export Manufacturing”, Feminist Review, vol. 7, hh. 87-107.

Fajerman, M 2013, Review of the Regulatory Framework for Homeworkers in Indonesia, International Labour Organization, Jakarta.

Federici, S 2006, “Precarious Labor: A Feminist Viewpoint”, dilihat 20 Maret 2019, http://inthemiddleofthewhirlwind.wordpress.com/precarious-labor-a-feminist-viewpoint/

Federici, S 2012, Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle, PM Press.

Fraser, N 2017, “Crisis of Care? On the Social Reproductive Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism”, dalam T Bhattacharya (ed.), Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression, Pluto Press, London, hh. 2-36.

Graeber, D 2018, Bullshit Jobs, Allen Lane, Great Britain.

Harvey, D 2005, A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford University Press, Inc, New York.

Hickey, S 2010, “The Government of Chronic Poverty: From Exclusion to Citizenship?”, Development Studies, vol. 46, no. 7, hh. 1139–1155.

Hopkins, CT 2017, “Mostly Work, Little Pay: Social Reproduction, Migration, and Paid Domestic Work in Montreal”, dalam T Bhattacharya (ed.), Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression, Pluto Press, London, hh. 131-147.

Izzati, FF 2019, “Frauen im Daringgeschäft: Zwischen Hausarbeit und Zweitjob”, Südostasien, dilihat 1 April 2019, https://suedostasien.net/frauen-im-daringgeschaeft-zwischen-hausarbeit-und-zweitjob/

Keating, C, Rasmussen, C & Rishi P 2010, “The Rationality of Empowerment: Microcredit, Accumulation by Dispossession, and the Gendered Economy”, Signs (Feminists Theorize International Political Economy Special Issue), vol. 36, no. 1, hh. 153-176.

Mayday Rooms, dilihat 22 Maret 2019, https://maydayrooms.omeka.net/

McEwan, C 2001, “Post colonialism, feminism and development: intersections and dilemmas”, Progress in Development Studies, vol. 1, no.2, hh. 93-111.

Mezzadri, A 2016, “Class, gender and the sweatshop: On the nexus between labour commodification and exploitation”, Third World Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 10, hh. 1877-1900.

Mies, M 1998, Patriarchy & Accumulation on a World Scale, Zed Books, Ltd, New York.

Mohandesi, S & Teitelman, E 2017, “Without Reserves”, dalam T Bhattacharya (ed.), Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression, Pluto Press, London, hh. 37-67.

Mohanty, CT 2003, “‘Under Western Eyes’ Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggles”, Signs, vol. 28, no. 2, hh. 499-535.

Mohanty, CT 1988, “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses”, Feminist Review, issue 30, hh. 61-88.

Pratap, S 2014, Emerging Trends in Factory Asia: International Capital Mobility, Global Value Chains and the Labour Movement, Asia Monitor Resource Centre, Hongkong.

Rahayu, AW 2015, “Perempuan dan Belenggu Peran Kultural”, Jurnal Perempuan, dilihat 22 April 2019, https://www.jurnalperempuan.org/wacana-feminis/perempuan-dan-belenggu-peran-kultural

Razavi, S & Miller, C 1995, From WID to GAD: Conceptual Shifts in the Women and Development Discourse.

Rowbotham, S 2010, Dreamers of A New Day: Women Who Invented the Twentieth Century, Verso, London.

Safaria, AF 2003, “Makna Welfare dan Well-Being bagi Buruh Informal (Studi Kasus Buruh Subkontrak di Industri Tekstil Majalaya, Jawa Barat”, Jurnal Analisis Sosial, vol. 8, no. 3, hh. 77-96.

Sardenberg, CMB 2008, “Liberal vs. Liberating Empowerment: A Latin American Feminist Perspective on Conceptualising Women’s Empowerment”, IDS Bulletin, vol. 39, no.6, hh. 18-27.

Silver, BJ 2003, Forces of Labour: Workers Movements and Globalization Since 1870, Cambridge University Press.

Solidaritas Perempuan 2014, “Situasi Kekerasan dan Pelanggaran Hak Buruh Migran Perempuan dan Keluarganya di Negara ASEAN, Laporan Hasil Pemetaan di Wilayah: Mataram, Sumbawa, Kendari, Makassar, Palu, Karawang”, Solidaritas Perempuan, Jakarta.

Standing, G 1999, “Global Feminization through Flexible Labor: A Theme Revisited”, World Development, vol. 27, no. 3, hh. 583-602.

Staples, DE 2007, No Place Like Home: Organizing Home-Based Labor in the Era of Structural Adjustment, Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Weeks, K 2011, The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries, Duke University Press, London.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.