Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Rethinking and Queering Relationships in the Age of Same-sex Marriage: Multiplicities, Intensities, and New Potentialities

Hendri Yulius


This essay presents a theoretical discussion, analysis, and formulation to reconfigure new meanings, potentialities, and multiplicities of homosexual relationship/s. After a brief discussion on the rapid popularisation of marriage equality as the primary goal of queer movements, an overview of queer critique of marriage is provided. Attention given to the notion of homonormativity and the sharp criticism from queer negativity/queer anti-social. For these critiques, subjects are encouraged to occupy the abject position, which I argue, only further depoliticise queer politics. After a critical overview of this political stance, I offer Foucault and Deleuze accounts to explore multiple forms of relationships beyond marital institution, focusing on the ways in which relationships are to be understood as in terms of potentialities, intensities, and emergent forms and functions beyond the existing language capacities and formalised forms. This essay should, however, not situated as masterly or prescriptive, but rather a modest effort to spur more critical concerns,
discussions, and debates among queer Indonesians.


queer; homosexual; marriage equality; Foucault; Deleuze; potentialities; multiplicities; relationship

Full Text:



‘SSM: Australia returns resounding Yes vote but debate over details

has long way to go’ 2017, ABC News, 15 November, dilihat 20

November 2017,


Ahmed, S 2010, ‘Happy Objects’, in M Gregg & GJ Seigworth (eds),

The affect theory reader, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, hh.29-

Althusser, L 1971, ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses’, in

L Althusser (ed.), Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays, Monthly

Review Press, New York.

Berlant, LG 2011, Cruel optimism, Duke University Press, Durham.

Butler, J 2011, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of

Identity, Taylor and Francis, Hoboken.

Deleuze, G 1992, ‘Ethology: Spinoza and Us’, in J Crary & S Kwinter

(eds.), Incorporations, Zone, New York, NY, hh. 624-633.

Deutscher, P 2017, Foucault’s futures: a critique of reproductive

reason, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

Duggan, L 2002, ‘The New Homonormativity: The Sexual Politics of

Neoliberalism’, in R Castronovo & D Nelson, Materializing Democracy:

Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics, Duke University Press, Durham,

NC, hh. 175-194.

Edelman, L 2004, No future: queer theory and the death drive, Duke

University Press, Durham.

Eng, DL 2010, The feeling of kinship: queer liberalism and the

racialization of intimacy, Duke University Press, Durham [NC].

Foucault, M 1979, The history of sexuality, Allen-Lane, London.

Foucault, M 1997, ‘Friendship as a Way of Life’, in The essential works

of Foucault, 1954-1984,terj. R Hurley and others, New Press, New

York , c1997-c2000, hh. 135-140.

Halberstam, J 2011, The queer art of failure, Duke University Press,


Paternotte, D 2015, “Global Times, Global Debates? Same-Sex

Marriage Worldwide”, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender,

State & Society, vol. 22, no. 4, hh. 653-674.

Puar, JK 2007, Terrorist assemblages: homonationalism in queer

times, Duke University Press, Durham.

Puar, JK 2007, The Right to Maim, Duke University Press, Durham.

Ruti, M 2017, The ethics of opting out: queer theory’s defiant

subjects, Columbia University Press, New York.

Thomas, JD 2017, ‘Queer Sensibilities and Other Fagchild Tools’, in

M Brettschneider, S Burgess & C Keating, LGBTQ Politics: A Critical

Reader, New York University Press, New York, hh. 394-413.

Warner, M 2000, The trouble with normal: sex, politics, and the ethics

of queer life, 1st edn, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Weeks, J 2016, What is sexual history? Polity, Malden, MA; Cambridge,



  • There are currently no refbacks.